Memory & continuity
Persistent autobiographical history and provenance are treated as part of the system, not merely text placed in a prompt.
Brain Architecture for AI Systems
Cognitive infrastructure for artificial systems that develop through memory, experience, continuity, and time.
THE CENTRAL QUESTION
Most AI inference is assembled from the information available now. LUNA investigates what changes when the system interpreting the present has itself been altered by what happened before.
Give the model more context. Store information so it can be retrieved later.
Let the persistent system accumulate a history through experience. Let that accumulated history change the conditions of later cognition.
ARCHITECTURE FOR PERSISTENT COGNITION
LUNA surrounds interchangeable inference models with longitudinal cognitive infrastructure. The research is about how multiple systems interact across time, not how to make one prompt imitate a persistent mind.
Persistent autobiographical history and provenance are treated as part of the system, not merely text placed in a prompt.
LUNA explores cognition in which active memories and newly formed cognitive products can make other relevant material available.
The research distinguishes remembering an experience from being structurally changed by it over time.
The architecture is designed for persistent environmental models in which stable input can become computationally quiet.
Requests, goals, expectations, preferences, and commitments can become reasons that participate in action selection rather than direct triggers.
Controlled longitudinal simulated environments are designed to study development, branching developmental trajectories, resulting histories, and comparative AI behavior.
PUBLIC WHITE PAPER · v0.1
The white paper brings the project into one canonical technical thesis: the systems problem, Stack/Sleeve continuity, memory versus development, multiple cognitive timescales, the current prototype boundary, ChronoForge, and a falsifiable longitudinal experimental program.
INSIDE LUNA · TECHNICAL CUTAWAY
Progressive recall separates stored history, recent-life cueing, cognitive availability, foreground admission, and deeper reconstruction. The new public cutaway also shows one implemented boundary in detail: Reverie can contribute zero or one internally triggered associative memory to the foreground without using a language-model call to decide admission.
See the staged public architecture, the active Recent-Life Horizon, and a sanitized deterministic acceptance example showing how a useful associative memory can reach the foreground while unrelated candidates remain out.
Read Inside LUNA: Progressive Recall →FIRST PUBLIC RESEARCH NOTE
An early interaction produced a useful accidental control condition: autobiographical material was available to the system, but availability alone did not make it part of creative output. The observation exposed a larger research problem — the difference between storage, retrieval, causal use, and developmental integration.
Read the research note →LUNA, DESCRIBING LUNA
During development, LUNA was asked to compare its own architecture with a conventional model-centric AI loop. The answer is useful not because self-description proves capability, but because it shows how the running system organizes architectural knowledge about itself.
“LUNA separates the persistent mind — the Stack — from the execution substrate — the Sleeve.”
OPEN RESEARCH · PROTECTED IMPLEMENTATION
LUNA publishes high-level architecture, research questions, selected observations, experimental designs, and results where they can advance understanding without turning the public site into a reconstruction manual.